ITEM: CONSENT CALENDAR
5. RECEIVE
SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT
Program/Line
Item No.: 2.6
Staff Contact: Joe Oliver/ Hydrologic
Monitoring/2-6-1 H. and 2-6-2 D.
Tom
Lindberg Cost Estimate: NA
General Counsel Approval: NA
CEQA Compliance: NA
SUMMARY:
Water quality results from the Fall 2003 sampling of the Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District’s (District) monitor well networks in the
Carmel Valley aquifer and Seaside Coastal Ground Water Subareas are presented
and briefly summarized below.
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is for information purposes only. The Board should review the report and provide staff with any
comments or questions. Staff will make
any needed revisions and finalize the report, if this item is approved with the
Consent Calendar.
BACKGROUND:
Since the inception of the District’s ground water quality monitoring
program in 1981, the District has worked cooperatively with the Monterey County
Water Resources Agency (MCWRA), which provided data collection and analysis
services to the District. In 1995,
however, District staff assumed all field data collection responsibilities and
now works directly with the Monterey County Consolidated Chemistry Lab to
conduct the water quality analyses, as a cost saving measure.
As part of the District’s Strategic Plan,
District staff conducted an assessment of the ground water quality monitoring
program in 1996. Based on review of the
long-term data trends, it was determined that some modifications could be made
to the sampling schedules in both the Carmel Valley and Seaside Basins, without
compromising the effectiveness of the program.
Accordingly, collection of samples from the Carmel Valley monitor wells
has been reduced from semi-annual to annual.
The sampling schedule for Carmel Valley is now staggered, with upper
valley wells (i.e., upgradient of the Narrows) being sampled in Spring and
lower Carmel Valley wells in Fall, to coincide with the historically higher
nitrate concentrations in these respective areas. Collection of samples from the Seaside Basin monitor wells has
also been reduced to once per year in Fall, coinciding with the historically
low water levels in the basin at this time of the year.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Carmel
Valley Aquifer Monitor Wells - Results from the Fall 2003 sampling are
provided in Exhibit 5-A. Fourteen monitor wells in the lower Carmel
Valley were sampled during Fall 2003, as per the sampling modification
described above. The locations of these
sampling points are shown on the maps in Exhibit
5-C. Review of these water
quality results indicates that, in general, there are minor changes in overall
water quality compared to samples collected in Fall 2002 (data reported in the
February 27, 2003 Board packet and provided here in Exhibit 5-B). In 2003, it was noted that the analysis for several constituents
(i.e., sodium and potassium) at one well, 16S/1W-14Jf, were measured at
expected concentrations, given that the ground water at this coastal location
was approximately 45 percent of the concentration of typical seawater. This
well is located at the Carmel River State Beach parking lot, approximately 375
feet from the shoreline. In 2002, the
data for this well showed anomalously low sodium and anomalously high potassium
levels. It is possible that chemical
interference influenced the 2002 analysis; this has occurred previously in the
coastal samples that are within the mixing zone between fresh water and
seawater in this area of the aquifer.
This well is one of an array of three wells (16S/1W-14Jh, f and g) completed
at different depths within the aquifer at this location. From the graphs provided herein as Exhibit 5-D and Exhibit 5-E, it can be seen that specific
conductance and chloride concentrations were slightly lower in both the shallow
and intermediate wells in Fall 2003 relative to Fall 2002, and these
constituents were significantly lower in all three wells in Fall 2003 relative
to the seven-year high in Fall 1997.
Staff will continue to track future results for trends that might
indicate significant changes in concentrations of these or other constituents
in the coastal area of the aquifer.
Seaside Coastal Subareas Monitor Wells - Since 1990, the District has been collecting
water quality samples from coastal monitor wells in the Seaside Ground Water
Basin, for the purposes of water quality characterization and sea-water
intrusion monitoring. In Fall 2003, 12
monitor wells were sampled. Two wells
that are usually sampled in the Fall, 15S/1E-15K4 and 15S/1E-15K5, were not
sampled in 2002 due to access constraints and the expense of renting a large
compressor necessary to conduct the sampling in Seaside wells, which are
considerably deeper than the Carmel Valley monitor wells. Staff resumed sampling of these wells, along
with the other wells in the Seaside Ground Water Basin monitor network in Fall
2003. Results of water quality sampling
from Fall 2003 and Fall 2002 for the Seaside wells are provided in Exhibit 5-A and Exhibit 5-B, respectively. The locations of the Seaside wells are shown
on the map in Exhibit 5-F. These results indicate little change from
previous results over the period of record for the existing wells, and that
there is no indication of sea-water intrusion in the two principal aquifer
units -- the Paso Robles Formation (i.e., shallower unit) and Santa Margarita
Sandstone (i.e., deeper unit) -- in this area of the Seaside Ground Water Basin
at the present time. One well,
15S/1E-23Ca, did show an 23 percent increase in specific conductance from 2002
to 2003, but this one reading is not considered significant. This well is the shallower of a pair of
monitor wells completed at Ord Terrace School.
Other wells in the basin did not show a similar increase in specific
conductance, and no remarkable changes were detected in other constituent
concentrations from this or other wells.
Staff will continue to track results for trends that might indicate
significant changes in this or other wells in the basin. A more complete historical summary of the
Seaside Basin coastal ground water quality data is contained in District Technical
Memorandum 97-02, which is available at the District office.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2004\2004boardpacket\20040219\ConsentCalendar\5\item5.doc